SFBG Logo

Login:   Password:   Sign Up! | Forgot your password?

NEWS + CULTURE
FOOD + DRINK
A + E
LITERATURE
MUSIC
FILM
HOME

CLASSIFIEDS »

PERSONALS »


Weekly Picks
BLOGS »

Bruce (B3)

The Guardian's San Francisco

Noise: music

Pixel Vision: Arts and Culture

Politics


PROMOTIONS
HUB »

Crossword

Local Merchant Videos

SPECIAL
ISSUES »

Best of The Bay 2007

Best of The Bay 2006

Nude Beaches

Summer Guide

Scene 2007

Feast 2007

Green Guide

Past Issues

CONTACT US »

Our Masthead

Editorial Staff

Business Staff

Listings Policy

Jobs & Internships

Advertise with us

Dogs behind bars
A shake-up at the Alameda Animal Shelter has left its charges locked up 23 hours a day
Digg This! Add to Del.icio.us Digg This! Add to Del.icio.us
toward staff members" — and as a result, the entire program has been changed.

Although a half-dozen core volunteers had each previously worked from three to five days a week every week, Barrett's new rules permit only two volunteers per hour and limit each volunteer to a maximum of 20 hours per month — one half day per week. Anyone who works more than four hours a week "will be given a mandatory break of two weeks," according to the August edition of the shelter's volunteer handbook, and if the infraction is repeated, the volunteer's service will be terminated.

At least six volunteers have resigned in protest. As Mary Sutter and her 16-year-old daughter, Kaity Sutter, who were volunteers for four years, explained in a July 25 letter, a copy of which was provided to us, "We left ... because we felt that policies were being put in place to control people to the detriment of the dogs.

Alameda city manager Debra Kurita has barred Barrett from speaking to the media, and Lt. Bill Scott, Barrett's supervisor, serves as her designated spokesperson. Scott defended the changes as allowing "increased efficiency and supervision." Asked about the reduction in the volunteer hours — formerly 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., now 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. — Scott said, "We can do more now in three hours than we could before in five," but he could not explain how, nor which tasks are being accomplished more quickly.

Scott insisted that the volunteers who were most recently let go were dismissed for cumulative histories of infractions. A June 27 memo from Barrett outlined the problems, some of which seem to be a bit of a stretch.

One volunteer, Jim Gotelli, was cited for "tampering with city property" — because, according to Gotelli, he bought and attached a new hose nozzle to replace a broken one.

Gotelli was also given a written reprimand for contacting a law professor at UCLA who is an animal-law expert and asking if the Alameda shelter was complying with the Hayden Bill, a state law that sets minimum standards for care in California animal shelters. Barrett informed Gotelli that as an agent of the city, he was barred from seeking outside legal advice. Gotelli was dismissed in July after writing a letter to the city attorney seeking policy clarification.

Another charge cited by Barrett — "feeding the dogs unauthorized food and causing them gastric distress" — apparently refers to Dan Mosso, who for 18 months paid out of his own pocket for premium-quality food for the dogs, with Barrett's consent, until she suddenly withdrew permission. Mosso was also terminated in July, for questioning shelter policy.

Scott also made dark hints to us about a "subgroup that needed to be broken up," apparently referring to a group of long-term core volunteers — Gotelli, Mosso, and Donna McCaskey — who suggested to Barrett ...


Digg This! Add to Del.icio.us Digg This! Add to Del.icio.us

( 0 comments | Comment on this article )